I woke up this morning to my local news station informing me of the John Mark Karr meal eaten on the plane to the United States. Is it me or someone else that this is an absolutely unnecessary information? I do not think my day that an essential element if you do not know what Karr ate their food in the U.S. I think I will work very well, thanks. This incident made me think, why in the world anyone in the field of news media think that was my understanding that the relevant information in the supply of a large meal Karr can help provide a clearer picture and information to authorities about his alleged involvement in the murder of JonBenet Ramsey - but I need to know that there Valrhona chocolate cake as the dessert to this meal extravagant These gadgets are not the only thing that bothers me -?. the whole story in general, I think I have a problem with is the amount of coverage it receives on a daily basis. I'm sure most people reading this article you agree with me at that time. JonBenet Ramsey's death was tragic, but where do you draw the line necessary and important to be useless and exploitating? It seems that the media is having a problem with the postponement of the line. However, we recently discovered that Karr was not involved in the murder of Ramsey, therefore, what media to cover this discovery in 20 some odd way to promote ratings.This obviously not the first time something like this has happened in the media. We saw it most recently with Michael Jackson. Yes, because it was a huge iconic figure as American culture, as a society, we feel this need to know what is happening. But do not think it appropriate to know the word for word what happens in the courtroom of this pop singer. We do not need to know what the family is feeling and thinking every second. I know it's a tense moment and confusing for them. It is not necessary that the badger and remember why you are in the situation they are in. Perhaps the most contentious situation that news coverage was so extreme for the scandal of President Bill Clinton when he was in office. In a vote of America, who feel it was appropriate for the public have provided a basis when the information regarding the involvement of Monica Lewinsky and President Bill Clinton began to appear. However, I think the media began to analyze every detail of the Clinton marriage, and began making stories when there were stories are told. I had no way of knowing that the Clinton family transported to Martha's Vineyard for a family getaway. Maybe they wanted to get away from the media to avoid being the target of biased news. Celebrities, as in any case, always the safe bet to go to when a story is interesting and juicy demand. The first time I remember eagerly received the news he was involved in the murder trial of OJ Simpson. I remember watching every single moment on television sitting next to my mother who was so immersed in its history. Yes, it's a tragic situation, but at what point it starts to become entertainment? Why tragic events in our society, our world, for that matter, be so interesting for the average 9.5 workers? Are our lives that boring, mundane, we have to look at the tragic news of other people to get our Let's face it, most if not all the news is tragic and sad That's going to another the only way most people get hooked -?. your heart strings need to be tugged.Now, this does not mean that I felt sad and upset by the death of Princess Diana or John F. Kennedy, Jr., but I do not need to know about every event that led to his death. I am sure that scores huge ratings for the various news media systems, but is that what should be done? If you take advantage of other peoples misery and sadness to have higher scores? Do the ends really justify the means Everyone in the news are human beings, as viewers -?. it is not necessary to aim in life only for a big news story is it really so good to know what someone eats on a plane to America? I think another way to look at is, is right to be entertained with a news story and I feel it is necessary to know all the information? Does that balance between entertainment and informative but there are news in the world?! It is very difficult to say that there should be because our society and culture have become so dependent on doing things only for self-improvement. Do not get me wrong - I'm not saying that the media or our society is scandalously corrupt - what I'm saying is that it seems to me there are a number of ways in which a story or a message can be treated that way . have been watching since it is most of my life seems a waste of time and full of useless information. So how does all this talk I can talk without saying what I want the news to tell me about? I want to know what is happening in the south all the people who were devastated by hurricanes last year. I want to know about the suffering people of Pakistan for the tragic earthquake that hit much of the country towards the end of 2005. I want to know what is being done to relieve the stresses of flying in the Americas and abroad? I want to know what President Bush is doing to help lower the prices of gas prices? I know what you need to know, not what it should be entertaining at the same time with all these other issues go unnoticed. I should not have to look for these important news stories. I think it must be faithfully followed and is covered much if not more, than the celebrity hook-ups "and" breaks. "You know something is wrong with the news that the news is considered that the divorce Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. Of course he refused the king of Hollywood and the Queen divorce, but cooooome! Do I have to get major airtime on CNN? I think not.
